Unitarians (for lack of a better word) want to expand the many existing uncheckable executive powers -- such as executive orders, decrees, memorandums, proclamations, national security directives and legislative signing statements -- that already allow presidents to enact a good deal of foreign and domestic policy without aid, interference or consent from Congress. Ardent proponents even insist that there are times when the president -- like a king -- should operate above the law.
I don't want any president, Democratic or Republican, to attain the powers of a king, but that's the direction we're headed in and it needs to be stopped now! The people rule this country, not any monarch, which would be no different then a dictator! This is one issue BOTH major parties should be in agreement on.
Definitely. I've already seen enough of that mentality to scare the heck out of me.
And now I need to go write an angry letter to Dana Nelson of the LA Times for the use of the word 'unitarian'. Another word or phrase should have been substituted. Instead, there may be some ludicrous confusion with the beliefs of Unitarian Universalists.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |